Join the Discussion

Group of people

You must be logged in to post to the Forum.

LOG IN >

REGISTER >


You must be logged in to post
Search Forums:


 






Idea for the implementation and use of selective tax areas

UserPost

12:09 pm
February 9, 2010


The eye.

Member

posts 3

OK, it's a start, but I don't hear any "tax fairness" involved, although, that's what you are proposing in essence. Places such as inner city, that need a magnetizing reason for people, an attraction, could use fairer taxes, and also, MLGW could make the rates in areas that "already paid for their piece of the pipe and wire" lower in exact accordance with what the costs are, instead of penalizing people who live there by making them pay for outlying areas infrastructure which SHOULD have been taken care of by the developers.

 So, yeah, great idea. 

"Fairness", an idea who's time has come. Again.Laugh


 Maybe we could get rid of multistory buildings that are falling apart in inner city areas, because, they attract crackheads, bums, drugdealers, and sex offenders.  There is a nationally available map for crime and Memphis doesn't look as good on it as it does on locally supplied crime maps, (which are a whitewashing).

 Maybe we could put up TRUE energy efficient buildings on sites of vacant lots and empty foreclosed properties instead of giving them to slumlords. It's not THAT hard, it's simpler and less costly than what we do today.

 We need and could put in properties that use "passive heating and cooling assisted systems" in addition to "wind powered electricity generators and storage banks", "solar electric collection and hot water systems", maybe these could be made by local citizens.

This would give new parents an edge on saving money for college and retirees lower costs for fixed incomes. I don't see MLGW redistributing the wealth to those who need it, instead they steal it and line their own pockets with it.

Maybe we could put parks, garden spots, and playgrounds on vacant lots too, not more basketball goals for truants and drug dealers to inhabit all day, but, for stay at home parents and elderly gardeners.

We could also have generic satellite offices for businesses in neighborhoods for jobs that do not require huge office buildings, walk or bike to work.

 Citizens who pay taxes are OWED quality city services, not corruption and it's aftereffects.

This is doable, but, it's against the tide of entrenched local council, commission, and appointees who get money from developers and other shady deals and will be a fight that may escalate into a real live war in Memphis.


 We'll win anyway, but, there may be a fight. These scumbags threaten, intimidate, and sometimes execute, so, be prepared to do what you have to to win, do not capitulate to their threats. Hit back harder.

2:49 pm
December 22, 2009


zach

New Member

posts 1

Post edited 7:54 pm – December 22, 2009 by zach


I just came out of a dry-run presentation by one of the commission educators, and there wasn't enough room on the form for a full break down of my suggestion.

From what I learned today, there are at least two tax districts required by law when a metro government is established. But two is the minimum, there could be hundreds of tax districts if the city saw fit. Which if there were, would present the metro government with a very interesting chance to develop blighted neighborhoods without just dumping money on them.

Allow me to explain.

Say the metro area was divided into a hundred or so tax districts. Each of these districts start out at a base line of tax. However, after studying data for a period of time, the metro government decided that there were areas that could use an economic kick-start. These would be areas affected by blight, crime, or some other combination of detrimental forces. The goal of the kick-start would be to drive people to this area both for residential and commericial purposes.

The kick-start could be delivered in a variety of ways. Here are a few examples:

-Passively. As the taxes for the metro area as a whole go up, kick-start areas are excempt from the taxes for a certain period of time or until an economic threshold is reached. People who can prove residency in these areas will pay less than those in other areas, making this a more attractive place to live and do business.

-Actively. Taxes are dropped for areas targeted for a kick-start, and partially raised for the wealthiest areas to balance the books. This will make the targeted areas more attractive to people that might be looking to locate to a new area.

The community could get directly involved with the proccess, as well. Neighborhoods could petition to be granted kick-start status. Home owners and business owners could work together to ensure an improved future for themselves specifically, and by doing so, improve the rest of the city over all.

I'm sure there are other iterations and shapes this idea could take, but it would be a way to both improve the city, and avoid the oncoming fight between the city and the county over old tax issues by fragmenting the metro area into something more than an us versus them.